Karınca Avukatlık

Structure of Political Parties, Dissolution and Appointment of Trustees

MAKALEAnayasa HukukuAv. Eray Karınca9 dk okuma

Law No. 2820: nature of parties, Constitutional Court dissolution, election vs civil judiciary, Supreme Election Council and trustee/interim-measure debate. Ankara constitutional law.

What Is the Structure and Nature of Political Parties?

Political parties resemble associations but have a special status. Law No. 2820 stresses that they are formed to shape the national will and to support a democratic order. Where the Law is silent and not incompatible, the Civil Code and Associations Law apply (Art. 121).

Can Political Parties Be Dissolved?

As subjects of the legal order, parties may face sanctions for unlawful acts. Since the Republic, dissolution and congress annulments have occurred; since 1963 the Constitutional Court has dissolved numerous parties.

Election Judiciary vs Civil Judiciary

Election and civil judiciaries are separate. Civil courts lack competence over congress elections beyond membership and discipline. Scrutiny and annulment of congress elections belong to the election judiciary. Party legitimacy in democracies comes from the people.

Dissolution Authority and Process (Arts. 98, 101)

Art. 98: dissolution by the Constitutional Court; suit by the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation; three-fifths majority required. Art. 101 lists grounds: unconstitutional statutes/programmes; becoming a focus of Art. 68/4 acts; foreign material aid—alternatively, cutting state aid in some cases. Many grounds are abstract and hard to apply objectively when judicial independence is weak.

Trustees, Interim Measures and the YSK

Law 2820 has no express trustee (kayyım) rule; Art. 112 punishes ballot fraud with imprisonment. Via Art. 121, Civil Code and Associations Law may apply. HMK Art. 391 allows broad interim measures; Civil Code Art. 427 may allow an administration trustee if a legal person lacks organs. Party bylaws matter. Congress elections fall under the Supreme Election Council (Art. 21; Constitution Art. 79—YSK decisions are final). Forced interpretations that let ordinary courts overturn final congress results or appoint trustees risk undermining the national-will function of parties and need compelling legal grounds.

At Karınca Law Firm in Çankaya we offer assessment on constitutional and SPK disputes in Ankara.

  • Parties have special legal personality (SPK)
  • Dissolution: AYM; suit: Yargıtay prosecutor; 3/5 majority
  • Congress oversight: election judiciary / YSK
  • No kayyım in SPK; TMK–Associations and interim measures debated
  • YSK decisions are final under Art. 79
SIYASI PARTILER2820 SAYILI KANUNPARTI KAPATMAANAYASA MAHKEMESIYSKKAYYIMSEÇIM YARGISIANAYASA HUKUKUANKARA AVUKAT

Related Articles

BACK TO ALL ARTICLES
Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions

What Is the Structure and Nature of Political Parties?+

Political parties resemble associations but have a special status. Law No. 2820 stresses that they are formed to shape the national will and to support a democratic order. Where the Law is silent and not incompatible, the Civil Code and Associations Law apply (Art. 121).

Can Political Parties Be Dissolved?+

As subjects of the legal order, parties may face sanctions for unlawful acts. Since the Republic, dissolution and congress annulments have occurred; since 1963 the Constitutional Court has dissolved numerous parties.

Election Judiciary vs Civil Judiciary nedir?+

Election and civil judiciaries are separate. Civil courts lack competence over congress elections beyond membership and discipline. Scrutiny and annulment of congress elections belong to the election judiciary. Party legitimacy in democracies comes from the people.

Dissolution Authority and Process (Arts. 98, 101) nedir?+

Art. 98: dissolution by the Constitutional Court; suit by the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation; three-fifths majority required. Art. 101 lists grounds: unconstitutional statutes/programmes; becoming a focus of Art. 68/4 acts; foreign material aid—alternatively, cutting state aid in some cases. Many grounds are abstract and hard to apply objectively when judicial independence is weak.

Trustees, Interim Measures and the YSK nedir?+

Law 2820 has no express trustee (kayyım) rule; Art. 112 punishes ballot fraud with imprisonment. Via Art. 121, Civil Code and Associations Law may apply. HMK Art. 391 allows broad interim measures; Civil Code Art. 427 may allow an administration trustee if a legal person lacks organs. Party bylaws matter. Congress elections fall under the Supreme Election Council (Art. 21; Constitution Art. 79—YSK decisions are final). Forced interpretations that let ordinary courts overturn final congress results or appoint trustees risk undermining the national-will function of parties and need compelling legal grounds. At Karınca Law Firm in Çankaya we offer assessment on constitutional and SPK disputes in Ankara. • Parties have special legal personality (SPK) • Dissolution: AYM; suit: Yargıtay prosecutor; 3/5 majority • Congress oversight: election judiciary / YSK • No kayyım in SPK; TMK–Associations and interim measures debated • YSK decisions are final under Art. 79